That is not the issue, that is just warnings from the complier, but when give you any errors, the real error is from java.util.NoSuchElement Exception

Think carefully about the order in which you're incrementing and censoring.

Getline reads until the newline character, so it will automatically only read one line. You are actually reading line by line, its just that the judge clips output so you can't see all of your output.

Everyone who has those runtimes have written the code in either c++ or pascal. Both languages are much faster than python. Learn to ignore what the best solutions part says and focus on your own code. As long as you get it right you're fine. 

And thanks for your kind words too, fifiman; a more thorough answer to how I manage my challenges here on wcipeg is right below Alex's comment :).

Certain languages (namely C, C++, and Pascal) are inherently very fast - much faster than Python, Ruby, Java, and the like. There is nothing you can do about this. Most problems are built so that all languages can pass provided that the asymptotic running time is correct. There are really no merits to improving your solution beyond getting AC (unless you want to practice constant optimization, which is a different issue). Your time is better spent on trying to work through harder problems.

As a side note, you might've noticed that even recent C/C++/Pascal submissions cannot get [i]exactly[/i] 0.000s like many best submissions you've seen. This is because those were submitted back when the judge had a different grading system (and possibly even hardware?), so the execution times may not have been as accurate.

Ops, I expected some kind of notification and missed this one: you may be right that my time is best spent elsewhere, though seeing that my slick algos are performing slower than some simple brute force may be frustrating.

Even so, I am here also to try and improve my performances, not just getting the right answer (which often is way too plain to me), so I'll try not to focus too much on my own reported times and a tad more on other users best practices and interesting code.

Btw, I sincerely doubt that C or the poor Pascal can really be HUNDREDS of time faster than my good old snake.

My program works perfectly fine on the given testcases but gives me 0 when i submit it? IS my code completely wrong? Thank You

also read announcement
http://wcipeg.com/comments/view#3719

[quote]Each word consists of letters of the alphabet and exactly one space separates adjacent words.[/quote]

you output for each input in order.  So the second one.

I got the exact smae problem Xiao Lei, it works well for all posibilities on my compiler, but I get 0/10 on the judge

Well, looks like you didn't test for multiple lines.

O.o-By multiple lines Hanson do you mean if one of the test cases is longer than the screen or multiple testcases

I mean multiple cases.
(The judge's "screen" is infinite, so no need to worry about stuff like that)

Oh, ok, but it still works fine. The only doubts I may have is punctuation like a period, but thats not mentioned in the problem and it seems like it works fine for others, and spacing. Would spacing like this correct

3
Hello world

**** ****

this is so very random

**** is so **** random

finally i am done

finally i am ****

There are no apostrophes in the test data. There is a test case which consists just of the word "Four", and you haven't censored it.

Thanks a lot! It turned out that I forgot one of the conditions lol...