| Title |
User |
Message |
Place |
Date Posted |
| Re: Legal Notice!? |
bbi5291 |
It's a bit of a joke, I suppose, not strictly necessary. I thought of it after I pasted some copyrighted code into my solution for CCC Substrings, and remarked that solutions can be freely viewed by a... |
General |
Feb 25, 2009 - 2:37:03 am UTC |
| Re: Just a reminder |
SourSpinach |
I'm fine with people seeing the strange stuff I submit here. |
aplusb |
Feb 25, 2009 - 2:10:29 am UTC |
| Legal Notice!? |
HelloMello |
Who made you put up the legal notice? It seems out of place here on a practice judge. Did someone get sued? |
General |
Feb 25, 2009 - 1:44:47 am UTC |
| Just a reminder |
Saravannan |
If you submit code here, everyone can see your code =P. Some people seem to be submitting code to other problems here. |
aplusb |
Feb 25, 2009 - 12:34:33 am UTC |
| Why does my program run faster, AND slower? |
Bob |
WHen i changed the variables to real (etc.), my program worked for most of the testcases faster - but more of the testcases overall became TLE. Why? |
ccc05s5 |
Feb 25, 2009 - 12:22:16 am UTC |
| Re: I'm assuming k has to be minimal? |
Saravannan |
I believe there's only one possible solution for each test case because my code works without really considering k to be minimal. |
ccc01s5 |
Feb 24, 2009 - 10:48:47 pm UTC |
| I'm assuming k has to be minimal? |
Bob |
|
ccc01s5 |
Feb 24, 2009 - 7:25:12 pm UTC |
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: g++ version |
SourSpinach |
Classic Brian comment |
General |
Feb 24, 2009 - 4:19:28 am UTC |
| Re: Re: 30 points programs |
bbi5291 |
I don't think any of the CCC stage 1 problems were worth 30 points in the first place - so in a certain sense all of them revert. |
General |
Feb 23, 2009 - 11:33:39 pm UTC |
| Re: Re: 30 points programs |
jargon |
It should just be the ones that were changed. |
General |
Feb 23, 2009 - 10:14:54 pm UTC |
