| Title |
User |
Message |
Place |
Date Posted |
| Re: Incorrect limits? |
jargon |
Fixed. |
ccc16s2p4 |
Jun 15, 2016 - 5:00:21 pm UTC |
| Incorrect limits? |
pacu |
I believe G can be as large as 10000. The original problem statement seems to have the correct limits: https://cemc.math.uwaterloo.ca/contests/computing/2016/stage%202/day2.pdf |
ccc16s2p4 |
Jun 15, 2016 - 3:23:56 am UTC |
| Re: judge |
jargon |
16:10: I previously said I wouldn't look into it. I think I actually will though; please give me a little bit. 16:17: I believe you are correct. I'll look into fixing it. Thank you for your report. W... |
coci064p5 |
Jun 09, 2016 - 4:10:22 pm UTC |
| judge |
mahdigh |
I think the judge doesn't work correctly. Please check it! |
coci064p5 |
Jun 09, 2016 - 12:45:09 pm UTC |
| Re: A question about the max value of m |
jargon |
Small enough that a program which fails for M cases but not 1 case is likely using the wrong approach. |
ccc99s2p4 |
Jun 07, 2016 - 6:40:07 pm UTC |
| A question about the max value of m |
Miminyte500 |
What is the max possible value for m, the number of test cases? |
ccc99s2p4 |
Jun 07, 2016 - 9:08:36 am UTC |
| Re: Problem with judge? |
kobortor |
wow so mean |
noi07p2 |
May 29, 2016 - 10:16:17 pm UTC |
| Re: Problem with judge? |
jargon |
You're correct; there was an error in the floating point checker. I've fixed it and am in the process of rejudging submissions. Edit: Rejudging is complete. The only users that was affected was kobor... |
noi07p2 |
May 29, 2016 - 3:32:44 pm UTC |
| Problem with judge? |
JeffreyL |
For test case 5 you can submit any number within ± a thousandth of correct answer and still get AC, ie. if the answer was 30000 submitting any number in [29970, 30030] would AC |
noi07p2 |
May 28, 2016 - 10:17:40 pm UTC |
| Re: 30 seconds time limit |
jargon |
It was originally used as a contest program and was never edited. I've set a time limit for this problem specifically. |
neerc10a |
May 28, 2016 - 2:02:43 am UTC |
