| Title |
User |
Message |
Place |
Date Posted |
| Re: RE? |
jargon |
If you return a nonzero value, then your code will RE. As long as you produce the correct output, however, you'll still earn the points. |
aplusb |
Jan 20, 2017 - 7:05:20 am UTC |
| Re: Can chat now |
jargon |
This is a measure against automated bots that cast a wide net. If somebody were to write a bot that specifically targeted us, then naturally this wouldn't work. Mind you, this isn't an invitation to... |
aplusb |
Jan 20, 2017 - 7:04:30 am UTC |
| Re: ... |
gpfault |
Very difficult, yes, but not impossible, and what do you mean by "only" 50 |
ccc08s2p6 |
Jan 20, 2017 - 6:34:40 am UTC |
| CRLF still not fixed |
gpfault |
Please fix :( |
ccc16j1 |
Jan 20, 2017 - 4:20:22 am UTC |
| RE? |
gpfault |
Somehow got 100/100 and an RE |
aplusb |
Jan 20, 2017 - 3:54:43 am UTC |
| Re: Can chat now |
gpfault |
Anybody who can write a spam bot can also solve this...(and I really doubt there are any "creative" solutions to this) |
aplusb |
Jan 20, 2017 - 3:53:12 am UTC |
| Re: What is wrong with my code? |
jargon |
You are not null-terminating reverse, hence your if (reverse == num) check will always fail. |
ccc00j2 |
Jan 18, 2017 - 3:26:56 am UTC |
| What is wrong with my code? |
r0gu3 |
I tested this out on my computer but it seemed to work. When I submitted this to the OJ it gave me an WA. :( |
ccc00j2 |
Jan 17, 2017 - 3:23:11 pm UTC |
| Re: RE |
Chinadoll |
Thank you very much! |
primes2 |
Jan 16, 2017 - 6:23:49 pm UTC |
| Re: RE |
jargon |
You're simply using too much memory. You'll need to try a different approach. However, I've noticed that the memory limit was actually too strict to be solved in Python, which uses references instead... |
primes2 |
Jan 15, 2017 - 6:25:32 pm UTC |
