| Title |
User |
Message |
Place |
Date Posted |
| Re: Bounds on N |
sigkill |
Sure, but presumably it was solvable for n = 100000 on the CCC 2007 machines, no? Otherwise it wouldn't have been set with that bound. Are these memory/time bounds actually those of the original probl... |
ccc07s2p4 |
Jun 01, 2017 - 4:27:42 am UTC |
| Re: Bounds on N |
jargon |
I believe it's due to the sheer amount of memory that would be required. |
ccc07s2p4 |
Jun 01, 2017 - 4:11:34 am UTC |
| I need this now!!! |
Jim42069 |
Exams are in 3 weeks... rip life. |
mockccc15j2 |
May 30, 2017 - 1:15:28 pm UTC |
| Re: Bounds on N |
sigkill |
Bump - I'm curious to know if there's some history here, if anybody does happen to know |
ccc07s2p4 |
May 29, 2017 - 5:13:23 am UTC |
| Beware of carriage returns |
sigkill |
The input data for this problem contains a bunch of stray '\r' characters which may cause you grief if you're freading the input in bulk. |
ioi9502 |
May 26, 2017 - 9:09:39 pm UTC |
| Re: what is the point of this problem? |
spencereir |
64 bit integers cannot hold numbers of 100000 digits (i.e., of size 10^100000) |
aplusb2 |
May 24, 2017 - 10:33:52 pm UTC |
| what is the point of this problem? |
hello12 |
what is the point of this problem? isnt it just like the first one? |
aplusb2 |
May 24, 2017 - 3:55:47 pm UTC |
| Re: Clarification |
Unknown |
yes, i had the same problem |
ccc03s3 |
May 24, 2017 - 12:57:13 pm UTC |
| Re: Runtime Error |
jargon |
2.6 introduced format using field names and positional specifiers, e.g. "abc {0} 123". Changed in version 2.7: The positional argument... |
ccc03s1 |
May 24, 2017 - 4:10:21 am UTC |
| Re: Runtime Error |
zikk0 |
For some reason beyond my comprehension, the judge doesn't support the .format() method, even though it was introduced in 2.6... |
ccc03s1 |
May 23, 2017 - 11:25:00 am UTC |
