| Title |
User |
Message |
Date Posted |
| Re: Re: my solution has WA only for bonus? |
bbi5291 |
I agree with you, Hanson must be wrong somehow. It's fixed. |
Aug 07, 2010 - 3:25:03 pm UTC |
| Re: Re: my solution has WA only for bonus? |
ryuuga |
??? did you even look at the third test case when you said that? The third could easily be solved by hand, unlike the others In the third line of second test case(sorry about getting it on my own), ... |
Aug 03, 2010 - 6:19:10 pm UTC |
| Re: Re: my solution has WA only for bonus? |
SourSpinach |
However, I do notice that Hanson's solution is different than yours, and it most definitely uses a small-enough amount of time and memory, while yours seems a bit uncertain. Plus, it's Hanson. |
Aug 03, 2010 - 3:54:58 pm UTC |
| Re: my solution has WA only for bonus? |
SourSpinach |
Well, I don't know what to say - Hanson agrees with the output that we had for this problem, and he's Hanson. You only get 1 of the 6 sub-cases wrong (the 3rd one, which is close to the limit), in wh... |
Aug 03, 2010 - 3:51:52 pm UTC |
| my solution has WA only for bonus? |
ryuuga |
My solution runs within time and memory constraints(after realizing that solution wasn't actually O(n^2 or n^3) time and memory), but gives WA for the bonus, and not the regular cases. My solution d... |
Aug 03, 2010 - 2:02:42 am UTC |
| Re: Does Bonus part have to be done for full 10pt? |
bbi5291 |
It appears you'll get half the points if you don't do the bonus. |
Dec 09, 2008 - 11:47:03 pm UTC |
| Does Bonus part have to be done for full 10pt? |
StealthAdept |
|
Dec 05, 2008 - 6:36:34 pm UTC |
