| Title |
User |
Message |
Date Posted |
| Re: Re: Two Cases |
DrSane |
Congrats on your achievement. You should get an e-mail or letter from Troy soon. I haven't actually spoken to him since Stage 2 so I do not know what's happening with your training. All I know is that... |
Jul 15, 2009 - 2:49:14 am UTC |
| Re: Re: Two Cases |
Foundation |
Hehe, I'll see you there then. They still have not told us about anything regarding any training... Do you know any specific dates? |
Jul 14, 2009 - 12:58:19 pm UTC |
| Re: Re: Two Cases |
DrSane |
Sometimes. I usually try to think of a real life problem and a list of possible variations, then think of several algorithmic solutions, and tweak the problem to make it require the more interesting s... |
Jul 14, 2009 - 2:04:12 am UTC |
| Re: Re: Two Cases |
Foundation |
Thanks for the quick reply, I realized what was special about them (though they may seem not special at all). You were right, room was the thing that I was lacking. Accidentally looping through N as t... |
Jul 10, 2009 - 11:08:27 am UTC |
| Re: Two Cases |
DrSane |
As far as I can tell from the program that generated them, there's nothing special about those two test cases that would make you fail them individually. Make sure your data structure(s) aren't runnin... |
Jul 10, 2009 - 2:18:53 am UTC |
| Two Cases |
Foundation |
Case 10 and 12 keep giving me WA...are there any special things in the problem statement I'm not noticing? |
Jul 10, 2009 - 1:43:22 am UTC |
