| Title |
User |
Message |
Date Posted |
| Re: Strongest test cases added |
jargon |
I'm actually kind of surprised that Java uses straight quicksort on primitives -- I didn't know that it behaved differently than it does for objects (where it uses O(n log n) mergesort). However, it ... |
May 26, 2015 - 11:10:39 pm UTC |
| Re: Strongest test cases added |
xiaowuc1 |
I'm uncomfortable with the precedent that this is setting for Java users. Most Java coders would be surprised to hear that Arrays#sort on primitive arrays is actually quadratic-time worst case, determ... |
May 26, 2015 - 6:16:01 pm UTC |
| Re: Strongest test cases added |
jargon |
We reserve the right to modify test cases, point values, and pretty much everything else on this site as we see fit. If stronger test data broke your solution, then do as you did here -- fix it! :-) |
May 26, 2015 - 3:02:54 am UTC |
| Re: Strongest test cases added |
xiaowuc1 |
I'm pretty annoyed by one of the test cases that was added that "broke" my solution. Should I assume that that flavour of test data can be added to any problem on this judge now? |
May 26, 2015 - 12:25:09 am UTC |
| Strongest test cases added |
Alex |
Stronger test cases added courtesy of FatalEagle. All submissions were rejudged. |
Nov 09, 2014 - 12:04:50 am UTC |
