| Title |
User |
Message |
Date Posted |
| Wording |
DannyYang |
"Furthermore, the ratio between the value of voucher A and voucher B on day K just happens to be RateK." It's much better to say "Amount of" instead of "Value of". Edit: Never mind, koosaga had alrea... |
Jul 20, 2018 - 6:02:59 pm UTC |
| Re: Wrong description? |
koosaga |
According to chinese resource it seems that RateK[x] is the "ratio of amount that exchange center give", so (amount of voucher A given) : (amount of voucher B given) = RateK[x] : 1, regardless of the ... |
Oct 20, 2017 - 1:47:17 am UTC |
| Wrong description? |
koosaga |
* We note that on day K, the values of voucher A and voucher B are respectively AK and BK (dollars/unit voucher). * Furthermore, the ratio between the value of voucher A and voucher B on day K just h... |
Oct 20, 2017 - 1:35:31 am UTC |
| Re: Problem with judge? |
kobortor |
wow so mean |
May 29, 2016 - 10:16:17 pm UTC |
| Re: Problem with judge? |
jargon |
You're correct; there was an error in the floating point checker. I've fixed it and am in the process of rejudging submissions. Edit: Rejudging is complete. The only users that was affected was kobor... |
May 29, 2016 - 3:32:44 pm UTC |
| Problem with judge? |
JeffreyL |
For test case 5 you can submit any number within ± a thousandth of correct answer and still get AC, ie. if the answer was 30000 submitting any number in [29970, 30030] would AC |
May 28, 2016 - 10:17:40 pm UTC |
