Title |
User |
Message |
Date Posted |
Re: test case 4 |
magicalsoup |
yes, you're right jargon senpai |
Feb 16, 2018 - 6:49:17 pm UTC |
Re: test case 4 |
jargon |
Hardcoding inputs is against the rules. Please don't do this. Your submissions may be deleted without warning. |
Feb 16, 2018 - 4:16:32 pm UTC |
Re: test case 4 |
magicalsoup |
and how to to test case number four, either look at my solution or set i as 0, |
Feb 16, 2018 - 1:06:54 pm UTC |
Re: test case 4 |
magicalsoup |
peter, youre solution is hacking, why, would y ou do that, you dont learn anything, try not to do this next time |
Feb 16, 2018 - 1:06:24 pm UTC |
test case 4 |
whcpeterwang |
how to do test case 4? if the test mark that you want is lower than the what you already have? |
Feb 16, 2018 - 12:57:53 am UTC |
Re: uhhh, |
magicalsoup |
oh, i think i might get it |
Feb 15, 2018 - 1:59:37 am UTC |
Re: uhhh, |
magicalsoup |
but that theory does not work on the test cases, or maybe im not smart |
Feb 15, 2018 - 12:52:04 am UTC |
Re: uhhh, |
jargon |
Let's say I have 2 tests in my class and I got 90% on the first one. Now, if the second test is worth 50%, and I get 70% on it, do I have 160% overall? |
Feb 14, 2018 - 10:24:51 pm UTC |
uhhh, |
magicalsoup |
please help me explain the sample one, since if she got like 100 percent on her test, it would be 100*0.3 which does not equal to 89.5-85, so yeah |
Feb 14, 2018 - 10:02:53 pm UTC |
I need this now!!! |
Jim42069 |
Exams are in 3 weeks... rip life. |
May 30, 2017 - 1:15:28 pm UTC |