Results of Comment Search

Search:    Place:    Show:

Title User Message Date Posted
Re: Are you positive that it is doable with Python 3 (again)? Ajna Oh, I see, thanks. I see that I can, I mean, but of course I can't see his solution, not having solved it myself. Dec 25, 2014 - 11:56:32 am UTC
Re: Are you positive that it is doable with Python 3 (again)? jargon You can view all solutions by a given user by going to their profile and clicking on the (15 / 15) on their profile. Here's a direct link to quantum's 100/100 Py3 solution. Dec 24, 2014 - 6:32:56 am UTC
Re: Are you positive that it is doable with Python 3 (again)? Ajna Oh, you did 100/100 on Python in the time limit, quantum? But I don't see your solution, possibly because the system only keeps the best time per user and you submitted with another more performing la... Dec 22, 2014 - 8:42:05 pm UTC
Re: Are you positive that it is doable with Python 3 (again)? quantum Proven possible. Dec 21, 2014 - 4:54:43 pm UTC
Re: Are you positive that it is doable with Python 3 (again)? FatalEagle To be honest, I have not tested this problem with Python 3, so it might be impossible. But the intended algorithm in Python 2 should be able to get at least 85/100. Dec 21, 2014 - 3:49:32 pm UTC
Are you positive that it is doable with Python 3 (again)? Ajna I have an idea that could make my algo save some time, but before working for implementing it and seeing how much it does take to run the second part of the tests, I would like to know if there is som... Dec 21, 2014 - 12:54:21 pm UTC