Results of Comment Search
| Title | User | Message | Date Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Re: Re: Re: Oxygen | bleung91 | yes, 6 to 3 is invalid. | Dec 15, 2008 - 2:55:49 am UTC |
| Re: Re: Re: Oxygen | bbi5291 | down, down, right, down, down, right, right, right 5, 7, 8, 8, 6, 5, 4, 5, 3 The steps 5->7, 7->8, 8->8, 8->6, and 6->5 require oxygen. | Dec 15, 2008 - 2:05:33 am UTC |
| Re: Re: Oxygen | qinhaotian | Say you're going from an elevation of 6 to 3. I'd assume that's not valid right? 5 4 3 2 1 7 5 6 6 6 8 8 8 9 6 9 6 9 9 6 4 5 4 5 3 the answer is 5. can someone tell me which path to take that uses ... | Dec 15, 2008 - 1:51:50 am UTC |
| Re: Oxygen | bleung91 | oxygen is required every step you take, as long as it is valid (i.e. elevation is within 2). | Dec 15, 2008 - 1:40:00 am UTC |
| Oxygen | qinhaotian | so the oxygen needed is solely depedent on the starting elevation? | Dec 15, 2008 - 1:36:52 am UTC |
