| Title |
User |
Message |
Date Posted |
| Re: Can chat now |
jargon |
This is a measure against automated bots that cast a wide net. If somebody were to write a bot that specifically targeted us, then naturally this wouldn't work. Mind you, this isn't an invitation to... |
Jan 20, 2017 - 7:04:30 am UTC |
| RE? |
gpfault |
Somehow got 100/100 and an RE |
Jan 20, 2017 - 3:54:43 am UTC |
| Re: Can chat now |
gpfault |
Anybody who can write a spam bot can also solve this...(and I really doubt there are any "creative" solutions to this) |
Jan 20, 2017 - 3:53:12 am UTC |
| ... |
terminator |
run again |
Dec 30, 2016 - 2:20:34 pm UTC |
| help |
dang-son |
bruce why am i getting TLE? |
Aug 04, 2016 - 7:17:38 pm UTC |
| Re: Can chat now |
jargon |
We're going to make it so you'll have commenting privileges as soon as you score any points. The only reason it isn't yet is performance issues (read: implementer laziness). |
Apr 25, 2016 - 7:14:28 am UTC |
| Re: Can chat now |
bbi5291 |
This isn't even supposed to be a chat. It should really only be used for discussing whether the problem might have an issue, such as incorrect test data or an overly strict time limit. |
Apr 25, 2016 - 5:40:44 am UTC |
| Re: Can chat now |
spencereir |
There have been issues in the past with spambots, as there isn't really any registration verification. Since anybody who can program should be able to solve A plus B, this acts as a sort of filter, th... |
Apr 24, 2016 - 6:31:35 pm UTC |
| Can chat now |
AndrewYe133 |
I fanally can chat. Why does peg make you do this question in order to chat? its werid. |
Apr 24, 2016 - 5:40:28 pm UTC |
| Finally figured out how to solve this problem |
nullptr |
|
Dec 04, 2015 - 4:22:22 am UTC |
