| Title |
User |
Message |
Date Posted |
| Re: ... |
jargon |
Look carefully at your output. |
Sep 22, 2018 - 7:40:14 am UTC |
| Re: ... |
magicalsoup |
he is saying that your code does not produce the right results |
Sep 21, 2018 - 10:32:17 pm UTC |
| Re: ... |
nsola |
on my computer its working fine, even with the sample inputs |
Sep 21, 2018 - 8:12:09 am UTC |
| Re: ... |
jargon |
Your program is not working. In fact, it is not even working for the sample input; check your output carefully. Please note there are other cases besides the sample cases. You should try to think abo... |
Sep 21, 2018 - 8:00:24 am UTC |
| ... |
nsola |
My program is working as it requires it to be, but the test cases shows me this: Test case #1: WA [0.005s, 2888K] (0/3) (Details) Test case #2: AC [0.004s, 2888K] (3/3) Test case #3: WA [0.005s, 2888K... |
Sep 21, 2018 - 7:31:37 am UTC |
| Re: Missing prompt information in description and data |
Jim42069 |
Realized that too late... 3 re-submissions too late... |
Apr 28, 2017 - 8:54:41 pm UTC |
| Re: Missing prompt information in description and data |
jargon |
This is intentional. Per the README: Input and output are to be in the exact format indicated on the problem description. Do not prompt... |
Feb 21, 2017 - 12:03:59 am UTC |
| Missing prompt information in description and data |
tyxchen |
In the original problem text, submissions are required to prompt the user. However, since the prompts are missing from both the description and the problem data on WCIPEG, solutions that work here won... |
Feb 20, 2017 - 11:55:19 pm UTC |
