Results of Comment Search

Search:    Place:    Show:

Title User Message Date Posted
Re: RE? jargon If you return a nonzero value, then your code will RE. As long as you produce the correct output, however, you'll still earn the points. Jan 20, 2017 - 7:05:20 am UTC
Re: Can chat now jargon This is a measure against automated bots that cast a wide net. If somebody were to write a bot that specifically targeted us, then naturally this wouldn't work. Mind you, this isn't an invitation to... Jan 20, 2017 - 7:04:30 am UTC
RE? gpfault Somehow got 100/100 and an RE Jan 20, 2017 - 3:54:43 am UTC
Re: Can chat now gpfault Anybody who can write a spam bot can also solve this...(and I really doubt there are any "creative" solutions to this) Jan 20, 2017 - 3:53:12 am UTC
... terminator run again Dec 30, 2016 - 2:20:34 pm UTC
help dang-son bruce why am i getting TLE? Aug 04, 2016 - 7:17:38 pm UTC
Re: Can chat now jargon We're going to make it so you'll have commenting privileges as soon as you score any points. The only reason it isn't yet is performance issues (read: implementer laziness). Apr 25, 2016 - 7:14:28 am UTC
Re: Can chat now bbi5291 This isn't even supposed to be a chat. It should really only be used for discussing whether the problem might have an issue, such as incorrect test data or an overly strict time limit. Apr 25, 2016 - 5:40:44 am UTC
Re: Can chat now spencereir There have been issues in the past with spambots, as there isn't really any registration verification. Since anybody who can program should be able to solve A plus B, this acts as a sort of filter, th... Apr 24, 2016 - 6:31:35 pm UTC
Can chat now AndrewYe133 I fanally can chat. Why does peg make you do this question in order to chat? its werid. Apr 24, 2016 - 5:40:28 pm UTC